Any nominations?
Posted: February 10, 2012 Filed under: Journalism Leave a comment »Each day my email box is flooded with press releases, many from state agencies. To be honest I have little use for these releases, but today’s release from the Oklahoma Insurance Department sure got my attention. I’m already trying to come up with my nomination for the Insurance Commissioner’s Award.
Later in the day the department sent a corrected version of the release along with an apology.
The Oklahoma Insurance Department apologizes for an unauthorized draft of an email that was distributed containing offensive and unacceptable language. This email was traced to a staff person who has accepted full responsibility and is deeply apologetic. Disciplinary action is being taken.
This email was not vetted through the normal process and neither the Insurance Commissioner nor any supervisory staff was aware of the distribution.
The Oklahoma Insurance Department, again, deeply apologizes for the unacceptable language.
Is AOL Patch coming to an end? It should
Posted: February 8, 2012 Filed under: Journalism | Tags: AOL Patch, Community Journalism Leave a comment »
Media critic Jim Romensko wrote on his blog today that AOL Patch it making plans to reduce its staff size and refocus it’s writing. A Patch insider told Romensko that “AOL is committed to Patch at least though this calendar year,” but he can’t “imagine AOL will put another penny into Patch in 2012.”
There will be some in the community newspaper industry that see this as a victory for small newspapers. There are many in the community newspaper biz that feared Patch when it first launched, believing a version of Patch would someday popup in their own community. Many of these editors and publishes were too lazy to do anything about it, such as try to be aggressive in their own Web-based reporting, but if Patch dissolves, at it appears it will do so in at least some form, then these same editors and publishers will chalk it up to the fact that Web-based community journalism doesn’t work and that readers still like their printed newspapers.
In reality, the demise of Patch will be an indication that Web-based community journalism doesn’t work when its low quality and those publishers should still fear the day that a Website launches in their own town that actually knows what they are doing.
Here are 4 reasons why Patch isn’t working and why it won’t work.
1) It’s really nothing more than a news blog. Most Patch sites have one “editor” that serves as the lone reporter. I believe a one-person newsroom could work in community journalism, but there has to be a strategic use of contributors to make it work. Plus, the one-person in the newsroom has to top notch, meaning they must be a great writer, understand social media, and capable of producing multimedia stories.
2) There is no uniqueness to each Patch site. The Hazelwood, Missouri Patch site looks just like the Berkley, California Patch site. The homepage layouts are clean and well organized, but there are no distinctive features that pay tribute to a particular community. People want local journalism because its unique to their own community, but the carbon copy form of publishing that Patch uses doesn’t highlight community journalism.
3) The news coverage is hit-or-miss. You can’t read Patch and know that you are always going to get coverage from last night’s city council meeting or the score from the football game. Many Patch sites post multiple times a day, but you never know what you are going to get. The tradition that newspapers have is that they will provide coverage on the same topics each week. If you heard an explosion in town chances are the local newspaper is on it, or will at least have a story on in it in the future. Heard there was a commotion at the city council meeting? You can assume the newspaper will have a story on it. In fact, you can assume the local newspaper will have a story on the city council meeting each week, whether it was boring or exciting. That’s called consistency and Patch often failed at it.
4) No local context for regional/national stories. One thing I thought AOL could have done was provide great national coverage on an issue and then allowed local Patch editors to fill in the blanks with local research, interviews and perspective. For example, AOL’s national news team could put together a story on the BP Oil Spill and allow local Patch editors along the coast to add their own community’s voice. I think AOL tried to funnel local stories up to the national level, but they should have also focused on the other way, too: national to local.
Satchel’s Room
Posted: September 29, 2011 Filed under: Baseball, Parenthood Leave a comment »Satchel Benjamin Felder’s room is a tribute to the Royals and the game of baseball.
Small town newspapers still doing their job
Posted: September 14, 2011 Filed under: Journalism Leave a comment »
The journalism industry is in turmoil, but not weekly newspapers, according to Judy Muller’s recent piece in the Los Angeles Times entitled “Where newspapers thrive.”
Muller spent some time recently exploring the world of small town newspapers and said they are an example of journalism success in an era when many have already pronounced he death of newspapers.
“At a time when mainstream news media are hemorrhaging and doomsayers are predicting the death of journalism (at least as we’ve known it), take heart: The free press is alive and well in small towns across America, thanks to the editors of thousands of weeklies who, for very little money and a fair amount of aggravation, keep on telling it like it is,” Muller said.
Muller does a good job exploring the challenge many small newspapers have when it comes to covering a beat where many editors are neighbors, or at least closely work with those they are required to hold accountable. It’s easy for a daily newspaper reporter to slam the mayor of a small town or school district superintendent, but for small newspaper editors like me, you want to be careful not to burn bridges while also practicing good journalism.
Muller also identifies the reason many small town newspapers are thriving, which is they are hyper-local, publishing stories readers can only find in the weekly newspaper. However, local news is personal news. Local business, schools and crimes are extremely personal issues to many people and its not uncommon for readers to respond passionately to the issues they read. Take for example the Williams Foods grocery store issue, which is only news in Piedmont. The story has been an important one for about a year as it deals with millions in taxpayer money, but many readers have made the issue extremely personal because it deals with their neighbors, family members and the future prosperity of their town.
But for all the challenges our industry faces, and we do face many, there does seem to be hope in many places, including the small town newspaper, where many of the founding pillars of journalism still live.
“I wouldn’t be so bold as to predict the future, not in a media landscape that is constantly shifting,” Muller said. “But when we engage in these discussions about how to “monetize” journalism, it’s refreshing to remember a different kind of bottom line, one that lives in the hearts of weekly newspaper editors and reporters who keep churning out news for the corniest of reasons — because their readers depend on it.”
I’m in love with a magazine
Posted: July 20, 2011 Filed under: Journalism, Media Leave a comment »I can still remember the day when I walked into Bulldog news stand in the University District of Seattle and first spotted a Monocle magazine. It was in the summer and it was the publication’s annual quality of life survey, which includes a review of the world’s top 25 cities based on quality of life and explores the things that make an urban environment a truly great one.
Needless to say, I quickly fell in love.
Over the next several months I became a devote reader of Monocle’s monthly issues and have continued to pick up a copy when I can. At $10 a pop its at least a $100 investment a year, but well worth it.
Monocle is a British based publication with a global perspective on urban culture, design and even fashion. Stories can range from interviews with city planners, an emerging neighborhood in Japan or even a photo spread of coffee shops from around the world. This year’s quality of life survey provides the list of top 25 but also explores other emerging communities, such as Newark. The magazine includes great writing and is informative, but I think the part I like the most is its experiential aspect. In today’s world of multimedia and wireless communication, Monocle continues to take pride in a printed product. It offers stunning imagery, smart ads, and other substance, such as pullout booklets and even comics.
When I pick up a Monocle I feel like I am picking up a complete media experience, minus the digital screen. However, its not a slice of nostalgia or a look back in time. Its very fresh and relevant but finds a different way to capture a reader’s soul beyond the common tools of today’s multimedia world.
I almost wonder if there is a lesson for newspaper in Monocle. The magazine embraces technology online and I am not a person that believes newspapers should be printed just for the sake of printing paper, but newspapers haven’t really changed much over the past decade when it experienced an assault from Web-based publications. If anything, the only change newspapers have made i by getting smaller.
Could a newspaper include comic book pullouts, sections devoted to stunning images and a re-imagination of the front page? Newspapers are still an experience but that experience hasn’t necessarily evolved over the past decade.
Monocle is an example of quality, care and stellar design being put back into a printed product; I just wish that mindset would spill more over into mainstream journalism.
Our old hood
Posted: July 3, 2011 Filed under: Uncategorized Leave a comment »After looking at a blog from Wallingford, the neighborhood in Seattle we use to call home, I stumbled across a video that shows that we used to live in the same apartment building as Ben Gibbard, a member of Death Cab Cutie. In fact, based on the video it appears that we might have had the same apartment as him, although that can’t be confirmed.
Satchel’s room…or mine?
Posted: July 3, 2011 Filed under: Baseball, Parenthood 1 Comment »
Someone asked me this week if we had assembled a crib yet and I said we hadn’t. Actually, we haven’t done much in the way of preparing Satchel’s room as September still feels like a ways off. But I did make my first contributions to his room today. I didn’t really plan to go with any type of theme, but a baseball and Royals theme is just kind of happening and I’m not going to fight it.
When my parents made the move to Tishomingo last week they dropped off a few boxes that contained stuff from my childhood. I’m not going to lie, I threw a lot of it away. But I plan to use a lot of the baseball stuff for Satchel’s room. Today I put up the bat and ball holders that I had as a child. One is shaped like a baseball helmet with a Royals logo and the other is shaped like a baseball glove (see picture).
My parents also dropped off a complete set of bases that I once used while playing backyard baseball and I decided there was no better use than to put a base in each corner. The crib will go up the first base line and I think the dresser might be best at shortstop.
People ask me if it feels real yet, having a baby. I’m not really sure what that means, and maybe someday soon I will, but I feel like my life has been pretty well prepared for change. I know a baby will be a big one, and I am excited, but during our marriage we have made cross country moves, had several jobs, attended a couple of schools and moved more times than I can count. Every year is something different and this year has already had its fair share of challenges and changes.
I guess putting stuff in his room does make this thing feel more real but I’m not sure it will really sink in until Satchel is actually here as his own person. Right now everything we do is really about us, and let’s face it, the first several years of a child’s life is more about the parents than the kid. We may pick out clothing and decorate a room, but its all for us. There isn’t much a baby can do I guess to be his or her own individual, but when those moments start happening I suppose that’s when it will feel the most “real” for me.
Until then, he’s going to have to put up with the Royals room until he can tell me what else he would like.



